The issue of selective criticism in the film industry is concerning. Often, media and critics display bias and overlook certain aspects. Recently, this trend has become evident with Sandeep Vanga and Sanjay Leela Bhansali.
When Sandeep Vanga released his film “Animal,” many feminists and industry insiders criticized his mindset. However, when Sanjay Leela Bhansali made similar remarks about his show “Heeramandi,” there was little reaction. Despite the show not gaining much attention, Bhansali’s comments went largely unnoticed.
Bhansali described “Heeramandi” as a romantic place, expressing his personal connection to the setting. He also made comments perceived as sexist, praising prostitutes as enigmatic and powerful women. He compared them favorably to middle-class women, stating they fascinated him more.
Critics argue that while Sandeep Reddy Vanga faced backlash for his comments, Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s remarks received comparatively little scrutiny. Some suggest that Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s comments were objectionable and warranted condemnation, regardless of his status in the industry. Others point to filmmakers like Shyam Benegal, who portrayed middle-class lives in their work, suggesting that such narratives are equally important.
The debate surrounding the selective criticism towards Vanga but not Bhansali highlights broader issues within the industry. It raises questions about fairness and accountability in addressing controversial statements made by filmmakers. Critics and audiences alike are calling for consistent standards in evaluating and responding to such remarks, regardless of the filmmaker’s reputation or status.
